WorldTax Compareโ† All Comparisons

Uzbekistan vs San Marino
Tax Rate Comparison

Enter your income below for a personal tax estimate, then scroll down for full rate breakdowns.

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan
vs
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฒ San Marino
Tax Year:

๐Ÿ’ฐ Personal Income Tax Calculator

Enter your income to see your estimated annual tax liability in each country โ€” side by side.

Enter your annual income above to see your personal tax comparison โ†’
Individual Income Tax (Top Marginal Rate)
Top Income Tax Rate
12%
Flat 12%; competitive attracting CIS investment
No change
9โ€“35%
35% top; EU association reforms ongoing
No change
VAT / GST / Sales Tax
VAT / GST / Sales Tax
12%
12% flat; no change planned
No change
17%
17% maintained
No change
Corporate Tax Rate
Corporate Tax Rate
15%
15%; Pillar Two for qualifying MNCs
No change
17%
17% IRES; Pillar Two compliance
No change
Capital Gains Tax
Capital Gains Tax
12%
12% flat
No change
0โ€“17%
CGT structure maintained
No change
Social Security & Payroll
Social Security / Payroll
~25%
Funded pension system growing; social protection expanding
No change
~30%
ISS reform; pension sustainability
No change
State, Regional & Local Taxes

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan โ€” Regional & Local Taxes

Uzbekistan's 14 regions (viloyatlar), Tashkent city, and the Republic of Karakalpakstan have limited independent tax powers. Local Councils of People's Deputies can set local tax rates within national frameworks. Local taxes include property tax on individuals, land tax for individuals, and water use tax (in rural areas). The State Tax Committee administers all major national taxes. Uzbekistan has undergone sweeping tax reforms since 2020 โ€” replacing a complex multi-rate VAT with a flat 12%, simplifying income and corporate tax.

๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฒ San Marino โ€” Municipal Taxes (Castelli)

San Marino's 9 castelli (municipalities) levy local property tax supplements and communal fees. San Marino is an enclave within Italy using the euro but maintaining fiscal sovereignty under a Convention with the EU. The income tax (IRPEF) uses a progressive scale. San Marino aims to be a competitive financial jurisdiction while maintaining EU market access โ€” with corporate tax notably lower than neighbouring Italy.

โš ๏ธ Disclaimer: Rates shown are standard top/headline rates for informational purposes. Actual tax liability depends on income level, residency, deductions, and tax treaties. 2025โ€“2026 data reflects announced or enacted rates and may be subject to change. Not financial or legal advice.

Uzbekistan vs San Marino: Key Tax Differences (2026)

๐Ÿ’ฐ Income Tax: ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฒ San Marino has a higher top income tax rate (12% vs 9โ€“35%). ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan is more favourable for high earners.

๐Ÿ›’ VAT/Sales Tax: San Marino has a higher consumption tax (12% vs 17%).

๐Ÿข Corporate Tax: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan offers a lower corporate rate (15% vs 17%), which can influence business location decisions.

๐Ÿ“ˆ Capital Gains: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan taxes investment gains at a lower rate (12% vs 17%), benefiting investors.

Related Comparisons

๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ ChinaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ Hong KongTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต JapanTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ณ MongoliaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United StatesTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท FranceTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช GermanyTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ IndiaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง United KingdomTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ AustraliaTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท BrazilTax comparison๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Uzbekistan vs ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ CanadaTax comparison